All News
Court Ruling

Bombay HC: Basement or Parking Ownership Alone Does Not Entitle Buyer to CHS Membership

Source: Bombay High CourtView source

The Bombay High Court ruled that owning only a basement or parking space, even under a registered conveyance deed, does not qualify a buyer for housing society membership since such areas are not legally a "flat."

The Bombay High Court has held that a person who owns only a basement or parking space in a building, even through a registered conveyance deed, cannot claim membership of the co-operative housing society on that basis alone. Justice Amit Borker delivered the ruling on February 2, dismissing a petition by a buyer who had purchased basement and parking premises at a Navi Mumbai society and sought membership as a flat owner.

Background of the dispute

The buyer had purchased the premises through a registered instrument in December 2019 and applied for society membership in August 2020. When the society did not respond within the prescribed period, an appellate authority initially ordered the society to admit him as a member. The state government later reversed that order on revision, holding that a basement and parking area does not meet the statutory definition of a "flat" under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The buyer then challenged the state government's order in the High Court.

Why the court rejected the claim

The court rejected the argument that the buyer had become a "deemed member" simply because the society failed to respond in time, holding that a deeming provision cannot expand membership eligibility beyond what the law permits. A key factor was the architect's certificate attached to the conveyance deed, which showed the basement and parking areas were excluded from the Floor Space Index (FSI) used for construction. The court held that such areas, unless shown as a self-contained unit in the sanctioned building plan, cannot be treated as an independent flat.

What this means for housing societies

  • Societies can rely on the sanctioned building plan and FSI status of a premises, not just a registered sale deed, when deciding whether an applicant qualifies for membership.
  • A managing committee's silence on a membership application does not automatically create "deemed membership" if the applicant was never eligible under the law in the first place.
  • Basements and parking areas remain common amenities of the society unless the sanctioned plan specifically marks them as an independent, self-contained flat.
  • Committees facing similar membership applications should check the architect's certificate and sanctioned plan before responding, rather than relying solely on the conveyance deed produced by the applicant.

The ruling gives Maharashtra housing societies clearer legal ground to decline membership applications based purely on basement or parking ownership, reducing the risk of forced admissions through appellate or deemed-membership routes.

For informational purposes

This news summary is based on publicly available information and is intended for general awareness only. It does not constitute legal advice. For guidance specific to your society, consult a qualified legal advisor or housing society consultant familiar with your situation.

Want the deeper picture?

Our blog covers the legal context, member rights, and practical steps behind every CHS issue in Maharashtra.

Browse all articles